From 0e1233b6d41e2aaca1bb4ac86d032cbabdc3e4d6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Lilleman auf Larv <lilleman@larvit.se>
Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2026 11:31:11 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] =?UTF-8?q?Answer=20product-owner=20round=201:=200=20?=
 =?UTF-8?q?=F0=9F=94=B4,=201=20=F0=9F=9F=A1;=20say=20a=20deeply=20nested?=
 =?UTF-8?q?=20list=20is=20still=20refused,=20only=20sooner?=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

---
 CHANGELOG.md | 10 +++++-----
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/CHANGELOG.md b/CHANGELOG.md
index c985ad6..b16ba33 100644
--- a/CHANGELOG.md
+++ b/CHANGELOG.md
@@ -20,11 +20,11 @@
   `<![CDATA[` or `<!` openers without a terminator, or many unclosed backtick runs outside a
   directive's `[content]`. Such a text took time quadratic in its length: 160000 characters of `<?`
   took seven seconds each way, now 50 ms.
-- Every reader takes time linear in the markdown when it holds many unclosed backtick runs inside an
-  inline directive's `[content]`, or blank lines or indented lines under list items nested deeply.
-  640000 characters of backtick runs in a directive took one second, now 100 ms; 20000 nested items
-  and as many blank lines took 10.7 seconds before they were refused as `unsupported-nesting-depth`,
-  now 40 ms.
+- Every reader takes time linear in the markdown when it holds blank lines under list items nested
+  deeply, and `losslessMarkdownToAdf` when it holds many unclosed backtick runs inside an inline
+  directive's `[content]`. Such a list is still refused as `unsupported-nesting-depth`, now after
+  40 ms where 20000 nested items and as many blank lines took 10.7 seconds; 640000 characters of
+  backtick runs in a directive took one second, now 100 ms.
 - The README compares the package with seven other ADF converters, each checked against its
   published version.