3
0
mirror of https://github.com/larvit/adf-codec.git synced 2026-11-13 04:08:29 +01:00

Answer prose round 1: 0 🔴, 8 🟡; say which reader skips what, reorder the migration's keep-the-mark advice, file the decision title as a question

This commit is contained in:
2026-10-14 20:57:30 +02:00
parent 01f1773677
commit d8fbff6fde
8 changed files with 44 additions and 36 deletions
+3 -3
View File
@@ -259,11 +259,11 @@ Their CommonMark suite exceptions are `node-model` (§The CommonMark suite check
## A mark skips a node that cannot hold it, and a mark wrapping only such nodes is refused, but for a link around hard breaks alone
2026-10-14, two reader panels of the viewer/editor app, the LLM pipeline and a support agent, 3 of
3 each. Goals 1, 4 and 6. Valid while Atlassian's schema withholds marks from inline nodes. Code
text follows by this entry's rule, unpanelled, 2026-10-14.
3 each. Goals 1, 4 and 6. Valid while Atlassian's schema withholds marks from inline nodes. Extended
to code text under this rule, without a panel, 2026-10-14.
A mark spelling skips a node that takes none of its type, code text included, which takes only
`link` and `annotation`. So `**Ping !adf:mention[@A]{id=x} now**` reads as bold text around a plain
`code`, `link` and `annotation`. So `**Ping !adf:mention[@A]{id=x} now**` reads as bold text around a plain
mention, and ``**`npm ci`**`` as plain code. A link whose text holds something besides hard breaks,
but no node that takes a link, is `unsupported-node-shape` in `losslessMarkdownToAdf`: the panel
refused to have `[!adf:status[Done]{color=green}](/u)` read as `/u` linked beside the status. A link