Answer prose round 1: the spec names each title and destination, the writing verdict is its own decision citing item 100, items 99 and 101 state what holds, and the migration and changelog rows say what they replace

docs/decisions.md

@@ -241,9 +241,15 @@ The same panel confirmed the other readings on 2026-10-09: a title as the captio
 text as linked alt text, and an empty link text as its URL, each 3 of 3; `[]()` as nothing, 5 of 7.
 Their CommonMark suite exceptions are `node-model` (§The CommonMark suite checks three ways).
 
-Writing, a writer panel of a product manager, an engineer and a support agent on 2026-10-11, 3 of
-3: `adfToLosslessMarkdown` writes an image only a link marks as `[![alt](url)](href)`, and a
-captioned image as the `!adf:caption` directive, since a title reads as hover text, not a caption.
+## A linked image is written `[![alt](url)](href)`, a captioned image as its directive
+
+2026-10-11, a writer panel of a product manager, an engineer and a support agent, 3 of 3 on each.
+Goal 6. Valid while the audience reads a title as hover text.
+
+`adfToLosslessMarkdown` writes a `media` whose only mark is a link as `[![alt](url)](href)`, which
+each reader expected before seeing the options. A captioned image keeps the `!adf:caption`
+directive: each reader read `![alt](url "title")` as hover text, not a caption. Every reader still
+reads that title as the caption; `todo.md` item 100 puts that reading back to a reader panel.
 
 ## Ids stay site-local