36b - §8, §9 and §14's decisions move to docs/decisions.md
CI / gate (push) Successful in 42s
CI / publish (push) Has been cancelled

This commit is contained in:
2026-09-28 03:54:34 +02:00
parent c64eed9301
commit fb97285899
9 changed files with 161 additions and 118 deletions
+124
View File
@@ -182,3 +182,127 @@ an npm consumer.
Published to public npm as `@larvit/adf-codec`. Public source: the Gitea repo goes public,
LICENSE in place, before the first publish.
## The formats are API
2026-08-23, content models 2026-09-16, the maintainer. Goals 1 and 6. Valid while consumers store
what the library emits.
The emitted markdown and HTML are contracts. After 1.0: previously-emitted output parsing
differently, or not at all, is MAJOR; new syntax while old output still round-trips is MINOR.
Pre-1.0, normal 0.x rules. A spelled node's content model is part of that contract — leaf or
container is the model, not the syntax — so giving a spelled node's model content it had not, or
taking it away, is MAJOR whatever ADF's own schema does.
The error surface is a contract too; `README.md` §The errors states it to the consumer, and the
types in `src/result.ts` hold its shape.
## The code list
2026-08-25, the maintainer; dated below where a rule came later. Goal 6. Valid while a consumer
switches on `code` with no `default`.
- Adding, removing or renaming a code is breaking, so a new cause takes an existing code whose
name reads true of it in both directions; where none does and a plain name exists, a new code —
in any 0.x minor, and after 1.0 only in a MAJOR (2026-09-18).
- A refusal whose cause is this library's own invariant rather than the input takes the existing
code nearest what the consumer sees — a document that does not convert is
`unsupported-node-shape` — since a code no input reaches is one no consumer can switch on
(2026-09-20).
- A refusal no spelling recovers from is a gap in the flavour rather than a code: give the flavour
the spelling and the code goes, which the freeze is the last moment for (`unspellable-link`,
2026-09-13). A cause the carry answers gets no code: a mark no spelling writes rides the carry
with its node.
## Which code a cause takes
2026-08-28, the maintainer; dated below where a rule came later. Goal 6. Valid while a consumer
handles one cause alike whichever node, attribute or direction raised it.
- A code names the cause; where one cause recurs across node types, across one mark's attributes
or across directions, one code covers them all and `path` and `message` say which —
`unsupported-nesting-depth` is the 500-level guard whichever direction hits it,
`unspellable-character` the text node and the code block alike. Where two codes stay apart, the
line between them is what they name: `unspellable-character` is a character CommonMark rewrites
wherever text holds it, `unspellable-whitespace` the newline no inline directive's content slot
spans, in either direction.
- A claim code names the spelling claimed, never the node that spelling would have built: a
malformed `!adf:table` is a `malformed-directive`, and an alignment colon a
`malformed-pipe-table` — the flavour's own delimiter row is `-` runs, so the grammar refuses the
colon rather than ADF's missing column model doing it. What the grammar itself refuses stays a
claim code, key order among it, and a leaf given a body is refused at its opener, as a container
missing its closer is (2026-09-16).
- A directive whose name reads back to no node is `unknown-directive-name` rather than a claim
code — the spelling is well formed, and telling that apart from a typo is what a consumer
switches on when a later MINOR gives the name meaning. A reserved name is a known name, so never
that code, and the two the flavour reserves part on form: a form the grammar does not have is a
claim code — `!adf:carry`, whose carry is the fence — and a well-formed form in the wrong place
is `unsupported-node-shape`, `!adf:listBreak` parting anything but two adjacent lists of one
type (2026-09-01).
- A well-formed directive the node tables refuse — an attribute a node does not hold or spells
elsewhere, a value outside its kind or its canonical spelling, an argument, or a body of a shape
its content model does not take — is `unsupported-node-shape`, the emitter's code for the same
mismatch read the other way: one code across both directions for good, since the call site
knows which direction it called and parting them after `0.1.0` is MAJOR (2026-09-23).
- A non-finite number takes two codes: `unsupported-node-shape` parsing, `not-an-adf-document`
emitting — no document holds one, so no round-trip crosses them (2026-09-23).
## `message` and `path`
2026-09-03, the path 2026-09-23, the maintainer. Goals 3 and 6. Valid while a person fixing the
input reads `message`.
- A message names the violation, not the rule alone — a rule by itself states a truth the reader
must invert before it reads as a failure — and where the flavour's claim refuses ordinary prose
it names the escape that unclaims the form claimed: `\!adf:` for a directive, block line and
inline alike, `\|` for every pipe row.
- `not-an-adf-document` carries the document's own path throughout: seven of the guard's eight
branches read the document's own shape, and threading a path to the eighth — a malformed node
anywhere in the tree — wants the manual stack the no-recursion rule (`AGENTS.md` §11) forces,
whose empty half no input reaches. The message names the violation instead.
## Publish on a version bump
2026-08-23, converging 2026-09-03, the maintainer. Goal 7. Valid while CI on `main` holds the npm
token.
`package.json` version on `main` is the source of truth. CI on `main`: tests green and version
differs from npm → publish and tag `vX.Y.Z`. No bump, no deploy; the bump is each shipping PR's
deliberate semver judgment. `publish.sh` is that job, and `private: true` stops it before it reads
the token, so the pipeline is live and silent until the maintainer's first bump drops the field.
The publish and the tag each observe their own end state — the version on npm, the tag on the
remote — and neither gates the other, so a run that dies between them converges on the next push
to `main` rather than leaving npm ahead of the tags. An unanswered registry reads the same as an
unpublished version, which npm's own duplicate rejection is what catches. The job rebuilds rather
than taking the gate's `dist`: the lockfile is committed, the image is patch-pinned and `tsc` is
deterministic, so the two builds agree, and promoting an artifact would make the release path
depend on a store that the gate would then have to keep.
## Docs describe the release being built
2026-09-16, the maintainer. Goal 7. Valid while a bump on `main` publishes.
Docs on `main` describe the release being built rather than the version npm holds, so they match it
the moment the bump publishes; add no interim note marking the gap.
## No schema validation
2026-08-23, the mark refusal 2026-08-25, the maintainer. Goal 1. Valid while the site a document
is saved to validates it.
No ADF schema validation or exported validator. A refusal that keeps the round-trip is not schema
validation, so the one a spelled node carrying the same mark type twice earns stays, and input
nesting a spelling inside its own kind (`*(*a*)*`) names that mark once.
## No streaming APIs
2026-08-23, the maintainer. Goal 8. Valid while a document fits in memory.
A call takes a whole document and returns a whole result.
## No performance budget
2026-08-23, the maintainer. Goal 8. Valid while no persona needs a speed figure.
Nothing is tuned past the scanning rule (`AGENTS.md` §11), and no figure is promised.