larvit/fejkdata
3
0
Fork 0
Code Pull Requests 1 Actions Activity

Record why the probe has no entry function

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Lilleman auf Larv
2026-09-28 00:28:25 +02:00
committed by Lillem4n
parent e66a5f9b4b
commit 1073232ca7
1 changed files with 2 additions and 1 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files
docs/decisions.md
+2 -1
View File
@@ -688,7 +688,8 @@ though `hasRead` states the same stop rule. Valid while the two differ in where
2026-09-28, larv-review on systems-architect's finding; awaiting approval. Goals 2 and 2026-09-28, larv-review on systems-architect's finding; awaiting approval. Goals 2 and
11: `pathCheck`, `pathCover`, `pathProbe` and `pathDraw` each loop over `stepInto` and 11: `pathCheck`, `pathCover`, `pathProbe` and `pathDraw` each loop over `stepInto` and
`table.route` themselves. One walk calling them through an interface or a type parameter `table.route` themselves, and `descend` and `tableReadOf` build their probe in place, so
its `drawn` map stays on the stack. One walk calling them through an interface or a type parameter
leaks the walker and the pins it holds, an allocation per reference read. Valid while Go's leaks the walker and the pins it holds, an allocation per reference read. Valid while Go's
escape analysis treats a call through an interface or a type parameter as leaking its escape analysis treats a call through an interface or a type parameter as leaking its
receiver. receiver.