Answer prose round 1: a true validity premise, the reading in two plain sentences, and the braces named one by one

This commit is contained in:
2026-10-05 17:15:35 +02:00
committed by Lillem4n
parent ad28f6621c
commit 68c896b916
2 changed files with 6 additions and 6 deletions
+5 -5
View File
@@ -850,9 +850,9 @@ the README's Format string section states. The maintainer ruled the escape impli
goal: doubled braces and a lone `}` belong to the `{…}` syntax, so the goal names no escape and
a lone `}` stays an error. Valid while a template escapes a brace by doubling it.
## Goal 7.2's "no escaping" means a template needs no special character beyond `{}`
## Goal 7.2's "no escaping" means a template needs no special character beyond `{` and `}`
2026-10-05, Lilleman auf Larv. Serves goal 7.2: your first template of your own needs no
escaping and no options. The maintainer reads it as a template being writable with no special
character other than the braces, so a literal brace written `{{` or `}}` keeps the goal. Valid
while a template's only special characters are its braces.
2026-10-05, Lilleman auf Larv. Serves goal 7.2. The maintainer reads "no escaping" as: a
template can be written with no special character other than `{` and `}`. A literal brace
written `{{` or `}}` therefore meets the goal. Valid while `{` and `}` are the only
characters with a meaning outside a `{…}` token.