Say a whole read draws the family apart, drop the decision the bare-reference one already states, and link the naming test to its decision
This commit is contained in:
@@ -47,6 +47,11 @@ This round, in order:
|
||||
where `NewTemplate` and `NewRecordTemplate` do not, and `List` claims to be every
|
||||
path `Fake` accepts, which a selector is too. Delete the dead `table.descends` and
|
||||
the redundant `string(key)` in `checkNoRepeatedItem`.
|
||||
- Keep only the standing choice in the decision "The rows of a table are alternatives",
|
||||
a choice's items refused as alternatives, and give it the goal it serves: the rest
|
||||
defines `alternatives`, which its comment in `family.go` already does, and the README's
|
||||
"which pairs are weighed against each other" sends a reader to the log for that
|
||||
definition.
|
||||
- Run the nine-seat panel again and file what it names here.
|
||||
|
||||
### Data
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user