diff --git a/AGENTS.md b/AGENTS.md index ca6a574..48905a0 100644 --- a/AGENTS.md +++ b/AGENTS.md @@ -11,10 +11,12 @@ - Gitea queues Actions runs that `/repos/{owner}/{repo}/actions/tasks` does not list, so an empty task list says nothing about whether CI ran; read `/repos/{owner}/{repo}/commits//status`. -- Every pull request scores with the `comprehension-panel` skill's four-seat run at - depth 1 and answers it in the same PR, per README goal 13: at or above 7.0, address - the findings in one run; below it, fix what the panel names within this PR's reach - and re-score, looping while the score climbs. No merge lowers the last score. +- README goal 13 is gated at 7.0 on the `comprehension-panel` skill, and below it + nothing else merges — no feature, no category, no data — bar a security fix and a + dependency bump. `todo.md` carries the round: the nine-seat findings run at depth 1, + a PR per item it names, then the run again, until the score passes. At or above 7.0 + every pull request scores with the four-seat run and answers it in one run. No merge + lowers the last score. - Hard tabs. No comment by default; delete a restatement, a rationale, history, or a file preamble. - One spelling per result: reject the other at `New`, and let the error name the spelling to use. - A standing choice a reader would relitigate goes under Decisions in the README, not in a comment. diff --git a/todo.md b/todo.md index b37618c..723f721 100644 --- a/todo.md +++ b/todo.md @@ -4,13 +4,22 @@ Ordered as the releases that ship it. ## v0.1.0 -### Reading the fence layer +### Comprehension, until the panel scores 7.0 -Nine readers scored the project 5.9 of 10 — Navigation 7.0, Locality 5.2, Shape 5.9, -Self-sufficiency 5.7 — and eight of them capped on Locality or Self-sufficiency. Every -one put `hold.go`, `draw.go` and `family.go` first for reading cost: 1,138 lines in +Nothing else ships while the score is under 7.0 — no feature, no category, no data — +bar a security fix and a dependency bump, per README goal 13. This section is one +round, replayed: the `comprehension-panel` skill's nine-seat findings run at depth 1, +a PR per item it names, then the run again, until the score passes. The run is the +nine-seat one: the round is meant to buy architectural change, and the four-seat +scoring run names too little to steer one. A fresh run replaces the items below. + +Scores, newest last: 5.9 on 2026-09-20 (Navigation 7.0, Locality 5.2, Shape 5.9, +Self-sufficiency 5.7), eight of nine seats capped by Locality or Self-sufficiency, all +nine naming `hold.go`, `draw.go` and `family.go` first for reading cost: 1,138 lines in which each file carries both a load-time fence and render-time machinery, so no file -name says whether a unit runs at `New` or at `Fake`. One chunk per item, in this order. +name says whether a unit runs at `New` or at `Fake`. + +This round, in order: - Define the fence vocabulary where a reader of the code meets it: fence, hold, pin, draw, draw group, expansion against render, family, whole. It exists only across five