Answer architecture round 3: walk a table's row node in the cycle check, record where the read-once spelling meets an inline refusal, and cite goal 5.2 for a path tag drawing afresh

This commit is contained in:
2026-10-05 09:42:54 +02:00
committed by Lillem4n
parent 938bbb5c43
commit f4a05fbb36
4 changed files with 19 additions and 3 deletions
+2 -2
View File
@@ -298,8 +298,8 @@ not agree on one among themselves; each must only hold that type.
The fields an embedded struct promotes are the struct's own — `e.First`, as
`encoding/json` and SQL mappers read them — so they are columns of its record and share
its names: one tag may bind `{/person as p}{p.first}` and another read `{p.sex}`, while a
path tag draws afresh as `{/path}` does (goal 4.1); a tagged field that another field hides is refused, not dropped. A named
its names: one tag may bind `{/person as p}{p.first}` and another read `{p.sex}` (goal 4.1),
while a path tag draws afresh as `{/path}` does (goal 5.2); a tagged field that another field hides is refused, not dropped. A named
struct field is another entity and a record of its own. `fake:"-"` leaves a struct
field, embedded or named, unfilled, so no name may be `-`; a pointer back to a struct
already being filled is left alone, since filling it would never end. `New` cannot see a