Answer stability round 1: 0 🔴, 3 🟡 (0 misread); gate test pins each source, builtin-route name, exact CSS wording
This commit is contained in:
@@ -231,8 +231,9 @@ export function findConflicts(plugins: Plugin[]): PluginConflict[] {
|
||||
return out;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Declaring is optional, but the admin screens offer only declared names: a gate on one nobody
|
||||
// declares answers 403 until someone writes the Keto tuple by hand.
|
||||
// Declaring is optional, but the admin screens offer only declared names: a route gated on one nobody
|
||||
// declares answers 403 (a nav node is hidden) until the Keto tuple is written by hand or
|
||||
// ADMIN_PERMISSIONS seeds it.
|
||||
function undeclaredGates(plugins: Plugin[]): PluginConflict[] {
|
||||
const declared = new Set(declaredPermissions(plugins).map((decl) => decl.name));
|
||||
const out: PluginConflict[] = [];
|
||||
@@ -241,7 +242,7 @@ function undeclaredGates(plugins: Plugin[]): PluginConflict[] {
|
||||
for (const route of plugin.routes ?? []) if (route.permission != null) gated.add(route.permission);
|
||||
collectNavPermissions(plugin.nav, (name) => gated.add(name));
|
||||
for (const name of [...gated].sort()) {
|
||||
if (!declared.has(name)) out.push({ kind: "permission", level: "warn", message: `plugin "${plugin.id}" gates on "${name}", which no installed plugin declares, so the admin screens can't grant it; add it to a plugin's \`permissions\``, plugins: [plugin.id] });
|
||||
if (!declared.has(name)) out.push({ kind: "permission", level: "warn", message: `plugin "${plugin.id}" gates on "${name}", which no installed plugin declares, so the admin screens can't grant it; declare it in that plugin's \`permissions\``, plugins: [plugin.id] });
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
return out;
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user