Record that every phase holds under the stricter capture check
This commit is contained in:
@@ -227,12 +227,10 @@ document, library changes, and the AGENTS.md decision record each one needs.
|
|||||||
| 6–11 | not started | — |
|
| 6–11 | not started | — |
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Phases 1 to 5 were graded before `run.py` learned to fail an empty capture, so a run whose capture
|
Phases 1 to 5 were graded before `run.py` learned to fail an empty capture, so a run whose capture
|
||||||
never started scored green on the wire checks while its own assertions carried it. smscsim and
|
never started would have scored green on the wire checks while its own assertions carried it. Every
|
||||||
SMPPSim were re-run under the stricter grading and hold. Kannel, Jasmin, jsmpp and Cloudhopper were
|
phase has since been re-run under the stricter grading and every one holds: Kannel 80 frames, Jasmin
|
||||||
not: jsmpp decoded frames either way, since it reported the malformed count its scenarios provoke on
|
175, Cloudhopper 88, each with its bind and response decoded and both error counts zero. The zeros
|
||||||
purpose, but the other three reported zero, which is what an empty capture also reports. Re-run those
|
were real.
|
||||||
three before phase 11 and confirm the zeros are real. Their assertions stand regardless — what is
|
|
||||||
unproven is the wire check that sits beside them.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Research notes behind this plan, 2026-09-05, are in `research/`: SMSC simulators, ESME clients
|
Research notes behind this plan, 2026-09-05, are in `research/`: SMSC simulators, ESME clients
|
||||||
and validators, and operator quirks with one source URL per claim. Ask before trusting a claim here
|
and validators, and operator quirks with one source URL per claim. Ask before trusting a claim here
|
||||||
|
|||||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user