From 311ee7c677addb2666244014f6ed80915a6c4005 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Lilleman auf Larv Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2026 16:31:07 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] Name the branches as the rename leaves them --- AGENTS.md | 2 +- interop-tests/AGENTS.md | 6 +++--- 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/AGENTS.md b/AGENTS.md index afd6685..ee70749 100644 --- a/AGENTS.md +++ b/AGENTS.md @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ Guidance for LLM agents working in this repository. What each file in it is for A ground-up TypeScript rewrite of `larvitsmpp` 0.4.0, published as `@larvit/smpp` 1.0.0. The branch started from an orphan commit — no history from 0.4.0 is carried over. The 0.4.0 source is still -readable on the `master` branch of the same repository and is the reference for protocol behaviour, +readable on the `v0.4.0` branch of the same repository and is the reference for protocol behaviour, not for structure or style. ## Goals diff --git a/interop-tests/AGENTS.md b/interop-tests/AGENTS.md index 91eb593..8946711 100644 --- a/interop-tests/AGENTS.md +++ b/interop-tests/AGENTS.md @@ -90,12 +90,12 @@ Then add the file to README.md's findings table. Every defect a phase records is fixed before the next phase runs — a fix can change behaviour in ways the next experiment must see. One fix per defect class, as its own change: -1. A worktree on a branch off `origin/typescript` (never `origin/master`, the 0.4.0 code), named +1. A worktree on a branch off `origin/main` (never `origin/v0.4.0`, the 0.4.0 code), named for the defect. 2. Regression tests in `test/` first, naming the behaviour with the reproducer from the findings; then the implementation; then the decision record in the root `AGENTS.md` where the fix settles a question of the wire or the session's life. -3. `/larv-review` on the branch, with the pull request based on `typescript`. When it marks the PR +3. `/larv-review` on the branch, with the pull request based on `main`. When it marks the PR ready, squash-merge it. -4. Back in the experiments worktree: fast-forward `typescript`, rerun the experiment that found the +4. Back in the experiments worktree: fast-forward `main`, rerun the experiment that found the defect, delete the workaround its test carried, and note the fix in the findings file.