Document answeredOnArrival for client receivers and onRequest refusal (#85)

* Document answeredOnArrival for client receivers and onRequest refusal

* Apply stability review: correct the onRequest bind claim and teardown order
This commit is contained in:
2026-09-06 06:30:18 +02:00
committed by GitHub
parent 184d1dc7af
commit 4194816d6b
3 changed files with 125 additions and 12 deletions
+43 -6
View File
@@ -132,7 +132,9 @@ most handsets and SMSCs stop well short of 255, and refusing beats a message onl
### Receiving
A `receiver` or `transceiver` client gets mobile-originated messages as `sms` events — the same
handle the server side gets, answered the same way:
handle the server side gets, answered the same way. That includes a multipart message: it was
already answered segment by segment before you see it, which changes what `sendResp()` does there —
see [Server](#server).
```javascript
session.on('sms', async sms => {
@@ -207,11 +209,12 @@ if (err) throw err;
smpp.on('session', session => {
session.on('sms', async sms => {
// Responding is part of the protocol, not optional. Without arguments it answers
// ESME_ROK with a generated id. On a message sendResp() still answers itself — see
// below — you may pass your own id, and a status to refuse the message:
// await sms.sendResp({ smsId: yourOwnId, status: 'ESME_RMSGQFUL' });
await sms.sendResp();
if (sms.answeredOnArrival) {
await sms.sendResp(); // multipart: already answered per segment; this only releases the shutdown drain
} else {
// no args: ESME_ROK + generated id; or sendResp({ smsId, status: 'ESME_RMSGQFUL' })
await sms.sendResp();
}
if (sms.dlr) {
await sms.sendDlr(); // same as sms.sendDlr('DELIVERED')
@@ -235,6 +238,40 @@ answers itself. `sms.smsId` is the base either way, and `sendDlr()` names `<smsI
and so on — the ids a `submit_sm`'s responses carried. A `deliver_sm` is answered with no id at all,
since SMPP marks that field unused, so an inbound message's base is a handle of your own only.
A refusal that depends on the request rather than the reassembled message — a full queue, an unknown
recipient, an unauthorised sender — needs to land before a segment is answered, which `sendResp()`
can no longer do once it has. A hand-wired `Session` (see [Bind direction](#bind-direction)) decides
there instead, at `onRequest`, which runs before any of the library's own handling:
```javascript
import net from 'node:net';
import { isCommand, Session } from '@larvit/smpp';
const knownRecipients = new Set(['46709771337']);
net.createServer(sock => {
const session = new Session({
onRequest: async (bound, pduObj) => {
if (!isCommand(pduObj, 'submit_sm') || knownRecipients.has(pduObj.params.destination_addr)) {
return false;
}
await bound.sendReturn(pduObj, 'ESME_RINVDSTADR');
return true;
},
sock,
});
session.linkEnd = 'smsc';
}).listen(2775);
```
Returning `true` means the hook has answered the PDU and the library leaves it alone; `false` lets
the built-in handling — reassembly, the `sms` event — run as usual. A hand-wired `Session` has no
bind handling of its own, though: `onRequest` is where a peer's bind gets accepted too, the way
`server()` does it.
`sendDlr` accepts `SCHEDULED`, `ENROUTE`, `DELIVERED`, `EXPIRED`, `DELETED`, `UNDELIVERABLE`,
`ACCEPTED`, `UNKNOWN`, `REJECTED` and `SKIPPED`. `SCHEDULED` and `ENROUTE` go out as intermediate
delivery notifications (`esm_class` 0x20), the rest as delivery receipts (0x04).