Narrow CodingSource to the two bodies, and file Locality's remaining work
Mirror / push (push) Has been cancelled
Test / test (20) (pull_request) Successful in 1m33s
Test / test (22) (pull_request) Successful in 32s
Test / test (24) (pull_request) Successful in 33s
Test / test (26) (pull_request) Successful in 40s
Test / lint (pull_request) Successful in 24s
Test / test (18) (pull_request) Successful in 32s
Mirror / push (push) Has been cancelled
Test / test (20) (pull_request) Successful in 1m33s
Test / test (22) (pull_request) Successful in 32s
Test / test (24) (pull_request) Successful in 33s
Test / test (26) (pull_request) Successful in 40s
Test / lint (pull_request) Successful in 24s
Test / test (18) (pull_request) Successful in 32s
This commit is contained in:
@@ -190,8 +190,8 @@ A nine-reader comprehension panel read the whole project on 2026-09-20 and score
|
||||
mean 6.8. Navigation (7–8) capped nobody. **Locality capped every unit reader at 5–6 and Shape
|
||||
capped both architects at 6**, and those two are what this release lifts. The gate is 7 on all four
|
||||
dimensions, higher where it is cheap. Maintainer's call, 2026-09-20. A systems-architect review the
|
||||
same day returned ALIGN with one blocking-severity finding, which is the first item under Locality
|
||||
and is also what the panel ranked hardest — two methods, one answer.
|
||||
same day returned ALIGN with one blocking-severity finding, `resolveBody`'s `settles` boolean, which
|
||||
the panel also ranked hardest; it is now a named `CodingSource`.
|
||||
|
||||
A four-seat scoring run on 2026-09-27 read #30 at 6, 6, 7 and 6, every seat capped by Locality in
|
||||
the held-message and shutdown code; #30 merged under the floor on condition that Locality is the
|
||||
@@ -199,6 +199,10 @@ next work ([decision](docs/decisions.md#internals-and-tests)).
|
||||
|
||||
### Locality — next, ahead of everything below; 5–6 today, and the gate is 7
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] **Lift the held-message and shutdown code to Locality 7, and confirm it with a scoring run.**
|
||||
The 2026-09-27 run capped every seat there; a run reading 7.0 or above also retires the #30
|
||||
decision.
|
||||
|
||||
### Correctness
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] **Settle what a repeated tag not marked `multiple` reads as, and pin it in a test.** A vendor
|
||||
@@ -292,10 +296,10 @@ next work ([decision](docs/decisions.md#internals-and-tests)).
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] **Move the one-line facts out of the decision log and back to the code.** Five of nine readers
|
||||
independently reported being sent to `docs/decisions.md` for a question they hit while reading,
|
||||
with no link from the code; one counted roughly fifty index redirects. The four worth inlining
|
||||
with no link from the code; one counted roughly fifty index redirects. The three left to inline
|
||||
as one line each: that `segmentUnits`' three numbers are in two units (septets and octets),
|
||||
which body settles `data_coding`, that a receipt's body is read as octets whatever its
|
||||
`data_coding` says, and the `<base>-<n>` id notation. The reasoning stays in the log; the
|
||||
that a receipt's body is read as octets whatever its `data_coding` says, and the `<base>-<n>`
|
||||
id notation. The reasoning stays in the log; the
|
||||
definition belongs at the code.
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] **Document the two delivery-receipt merge bounds.** `maxDlrMerges` (1000) and
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user