Record the branch renames: master to v0.4.0, typescript to main as default
This commit is contained in:
@@ -72,10 +72,10 @@ Rules the API follows:
|
||||
|
||||
Every defect listed in the AGENTS.md table has a regression test naming the behaviour.
|
||||
|
||||
## The GitHub backlog, once this branch is `master`
|
||||
## The GitHub backlog, once this branch is `main`
|
||||
|
||||
Nothing below is closed while `master` is still 0.4.0 — declining a security bump on a live default
|
||||
branch is worse than leaving it open. Work through this immediately after the merge.
|
||||
Nothing below is closed while the default branch is still 0.4.0 — declining a security bump on a live
|
||||
default branch is worse than leaving it open. Work through this immediately after the rename.
|
||||
|
||||
**Close as fixed by 1.0.0**, naming the replacement in the comment:
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -116,7 +116,16 @@ session message is a change to every call site.
|
||||
- [ ] Tag `v1.0.0` to publish.
|
||||
- [ ] `npm deprecate larvitsmpp` pointing at `@larvit/smpp`. Maintainer's call to run it; not
|
||||
something CI should do.
|
||||
- [ ] Decide what happens to `master`: this branch is an orphan, so merging it is a deliberate act.
|
||||
- [ ] **Rename the branches, once everything above is done.** Maintainer's call, 2026-09-04:
|
||||
`master` becomes `v0.4.0`, `typescript` becomes `main`, and `main` is the repository's default
|
||||
branch. Renaming rather than merging is what the orphan commit leaves available — the two
|
||||
histories share no ancestor, so a merge refuses them outright.
|
||||
- [ ] Rename `master` to `v0.4.0`.
|
||||
- [ ] Rename `typescript` to `main`, and make it the default branch.
|
||||
- [ ] Retarget what still points at an old name: [#71](https://github.com/larvit/larvitsmpp/pull/71),
|
||||
and the open PRs based on `master`, which a rename carries over rather than closes.
|
||||
- [ ] Delete `rewrite-base` once [#71](https://github.com/larvit/larvitsmpp/pull/71) is
|
||||
resolved; it exists only to give that PR a reviewable diff.
|
||||
|
||||
## Worth doing, not blocking
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user