Correct the doc claims the prose sweep falsified, and file the rest
Mirror / push (push) Successful in 5s
Test / lint (pull_request) Successful in 23s
Test / test (18) (pull_request) Successful in 32s
Test / test (20) (pull_request) Successful in 32s
Test / test (22) (pull_request) Successful in 32s
Test / test (24) (pull_request) Successful in 31s
Test / test (26) (pull_request) Successful in 32s
Mirror / push (push) Successful in 5s
Test / lint (pull_request) Successful in 23s
Test / test (18) (pull_request) Successful in 32s
Test / test (20) (pull_request) Successful in 32s
Test / test (22) (pull_request) Successful in 32s
Test / test (24) (pull_request) Successful in 31s
Test / test (26) (pull_request) Successful in 32s
This commit is contained in:
+6
-6
@@ -8,8 +8,8 @@ rule and an index of the titles below.
|
||||
|
||||
- **`Session` is publicly constructible, which is what makes `SessionOptions` and `ReconnectOptions`
|
||||
public too.** Raised twice as a leak; it is not one. The collaborators `session.ts` delegates to
|
||||
(`Reassembler`, `PendingRequests`, `SendWindow`, `ReconnectLoop`, `LinkTimers`, `LinkGate`,
|
||||
`DlrMerger`, `PduTransport`, `submitSms`) stay unpublished so they can be reshaped.
|
||||
(`IncomingRequests`, `OutgoingRequests`, `ReconnectLoop`, `LinkTimers`, `DlrMerger`,
|
||||
`PduTransport`, `submitSms`) stay unpublished so they can be reshaped.
|
||||
|
||||
- **`acceptsOptionalParams()` and `bindAllows()` are predicates, not chokepoints.** The library's own
|
||||
senders consult them; `session.send({ tlvs })` is passed through as written, because silently
|
||||
@@ -98,9 +98,9 @@ rule and an index of the titles below.
|
||||
optional-parameter threshold.** That threshold is fixed at 0x34 by the spec, so an implementation
|
||||
that must declare 5.0 throughout can, without moving it.
|
||||
|
||||
- **A peer that declared no version is pre-3.4, and `undefined` means no bind yet.** `acceptBind()`
|
||||
records what the ESME declared and the client's `bind()` records the `sc_interface_version` the
|
||||
SMSC answered with; a peer that declared nothing is recorded as `undeclaredInterfaceVersion` (0x00)
|
||||
- **A peer that declared no version is pre-3.4, and `undefined` means no bind yet.** `bound()`
|
||||
records what the peer declared, the ESME's `interface_version` or the SMSC's
|
||||
`sc_interface_version`; a peer that declared nothing is recorded as `undeclaredInterfaceVersion` (0x00)
|
||||
and sent no optional parameters, which is how the spec reads an absent `sc_interface_version`.
|
||||
|
||||
- **`esm_class` decides what a `deliver_sm` is, and the body is read only when it names nothing.**
|
||||
@@ -510,7 +510,7 @@ rule and an index of the titles below.
|
||||
Maintainer's call, 2026-08-31: without the split, an application that opens a replacement client on
|
||||
`close` ends up holding two binds on one account. `teardown()` picks the event by whether the
|
||||
reconnect loop is still live, and `end()` stops that loop before tearing down, so every deliberate
|
||||
shutdown emits `close`. A retry that opens a socket and then loses it clears `closed` through
|
||||
shutdown emits `close`. A retry that opens a socket and then loses it resets `lifecycle` through
|
||||
`attach()`, which is why a second drop emits again.
|
||||
|
||||
- **An answer belongs to the link the message arrived on; a receipt does not.** Maintainer's call,
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user