Note which phases need re-grading under the stricter capture check
This commit is contained in:
@@ -226,6 +226,14 @@ document, library changes, and the AGENTS.md decision record each one needs.
|
|||||||
| 5 | done | [05-java-clients.md](findings/05-java-clients.md) |
|
| 5 | done | [05-java-clients.md](findings/05-java-clients.md) |
|
||||||
| 6–11 | not started | — |
|
| 6–11 | not started | — |
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Phases 1 to 5 were graded before `run.py` learned to fail an empty capture, so a run whose capture
|
||||||
|
never started scored green on the wire checks while its own assertions carried it. smscsim and
|
||||||
|
SMPPSim were re-run under the stricter grading and hold. Kannel, Jasmin, jsmpp and Cloudhopper were
|
||||||
|
not: jsmpp decoded frames either way, since it reported the malformed count its scenarios provoke on
|
||||||
|
purpose, but the other three reported zero, which is what an empty capture also reports. Re-run those
|
||||||
|
three before phase 11 and confirm the zeros are real. Their assertions stand regardless — what is
|
||||||
|
unproven is the wire check that sits beside them.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Research notes behind this plan, 2026-09-05, are in `research/`: SMSC simulators, ESME clients
|
Research notes behind this plan, 2026-09-05, are in `research/`: SMSC simulators, ESME clients
|
||||||
and validators, and operator quirks with one source URL per claim. Ask before trusting a claim here
|
and validators, and operator quirks with one source URL per claim. Ask before trusting a claim here
|
||||||
that a peer's own docs would settle.
|
that a peer's own docs would settle.
|
||||||
|
|||||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user