Give the link's liveness one owner
Test / lint (pull_request) Successful in 24s
Test / test (18) (pull_request) Successful in 32s
Test / test (20) (pull_request) Successful in 32s
Test / test (22) (pull_request) Successful in 32s
Test / test (24) (pull_request) Successful in 32s
Mirror / push (push) Has been cancelled
Test / test (26) (pull_request) Successful in 32s
Test / lint (pull_request) Successful in 24s
Test / test (18) (pull_request) Successful in 32s
Test / test (20) (pull_request) Successful in 32s
Test / test (22) (pull_request) Successful in 32s
Test / test (24) (pull_request) Successful in 32s
Mirror / push (push) Has been cancelled
Test / test (26) (pull_request) Successful in 32s
This commit is contained in:
@@ -200,16 +200,11 @@ next work ([decision](docs/decisions.md#internals-and-tests)).
|
||||
### Locality — next, ahead of everything below; 5–6 today, and the gate is 7
|
||||
|
||||
A second four-seat run on 2026-09-28, after #35–#40, read 6, 6, 7 and 6 again, Locality 5, 5, 6
|
||||
and 5. Every seat ranked the session's lifecycle hardest and least wanted to modify it.
|
||||
and 5. Every seat ranked the session's lifecycle hardest and least wanted to modify it. A third,
|
||||
after #46, read 6, 6, 7 and 7, Locality 5, 5, 6 and 6; the link's liveness now has one owner.
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] **Lift Locality to 7, and confirm it with a scoring run.** A run reading 7.0 or above also
|
||||
retires the #30 and #46 decision. The sub-items are what the 2026-09-28 run named, most seats first.
|
||||
- [ ] **Give the link's liveness one owner.** A third run the same day, after #46, read 6, 6, 7 and
|
||||
7, Locality 5, 5, 6 and 6; all four seats ranked `drain()`/`end()`/`teardown()`/`retrying()`
|
||||
in `session.ts` hardest, because whether the link lives is kept in `Session.lifecycle`,
|
||||
`ReconnectLoop.halted`, `LinkGate.up`/`returning`, `OutgoingRequests.draining` and
|
||||
`IncomingRequests.linkGeneration`, held in step by statement order and the comment above
|
||||
`retrying()`. Four seats.
|
||||
retires the #30 and #46 decision.
|
||||
|
||||
### Correctness
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -369,9 +364,9 @@ and 5. Every seat ranked the session's lifecycle hardest and least wanted to mod
|
||||
cross-check in MIGRATION.md; the planned work in `interop-tests/AGENTS.md` (an expected
|
||||
malformed count per peer) and `benchmarks/README.md`.
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] **Make `LinkGate.isUp()`'s doc true or its state match it.** It says a link attached but not
|
||||
yet bound cannot carry a request, while `up` starts `true`, so the first link and a server
|
||||
session are up before any bind. The gate decision in `docs/decisions.md` makes the same claim
|
||||
- [ ] **Make `LinkLife` start unbound, or its decision's title true.** A link attached but not
|
||||
yet bound cannot carry a request, while `phase` starts `up`, so the first link and a server
|
||||
session are up before any bind. The `LinkLife` decision in `docs/decisions.md` makes the same claim
|
||||
in its title, and carries the same fix. From the comprehension panel of #25.
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] **Move `checkSessionOptions()`'s doc comment to what it describes.** It explains why a count
|
||||
@@ -485,9 +480,9 @@ and 5. Every seat ranked the session's lifecycle hardest and least wanted to mod
|
||||
support Gitea, so mirror each Gitea pull request to GitHub for it to review there.
|
||||
Maintainer's ask, 2026-09-14; not started until asked.
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] **Count what is left of a budget one way in `leftOf()` and the link gate.** Today they are one
|
||||
- [ ] **Count what is left of a budget one way in `leftOf()` and `LinkLife`.** Today they are one
|
||||
concept counted twice. `idle-waiters.ts` reads what is left of a budget as `Math.max(1,
|
||||
deadline - now)`, because 0 means "forever" there; `link-gate.ts` runs the same subtraction
|
||||
deadline - now)`, because 0 means "forever" there; `link-life.ts` runs the same subtraction
|
||||
and calls `<= 0` expired. Neither is reachable from the other, so nothing can disagree today,
|
||||
but a reader who learns one and applies it to the other is wrong. A budget type both take
|
||||
would close it. Raised by review, 2026-09-01.
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user