larvit/smpp-js
3
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Activity

Re-wrap the decision paragraphs and cut the narration from the finality record

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Lilleman auf Larv
2026-09-03 19:39:53 +02:00
parent 42e6e97447
commit fa40bb486c
1 changed files with 4 additions and 5 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files
AGENTS.md
+4 -5
View File
@@ -285,9 +285,9 @@ Grouped by what each one constrains.
reserved keeps the scrape, and a non-empty `receipted_message_id` TLV marks a report on the same reserved keeps the scrape, and a non-empty `receipted_message_id` TLV marks a report on the same
footing. A report this library recognises never reaches the reassembler, so an SMSC that splits one footing. A report this library recognises never reaches the reassembler, so an SMSC that splits one
across segments gets a `dlr` per segment rather than one merged report. The `message_state` TLV is across segments gets a `dlr` per segment rather than one merged report. The `message_state` TLV is
authoritative only where it names a state in the table — SMPP reserves authoritative only where it names a state in the table — SMPP reserves 0x80-0xFF for
0x80-0xFF for MC-vendor-specific values, so an unnameable one keeps its raw `statusId` and leaves MC-vendor-specific values, so an unnameable one keeps its raw `statusId` and leaves `statusMsg` to
`statusMsg` to the body. the body.
- **A report is final unless its `esm_class` or its state says otherwise, and only `ENROUTE` and - **A report is final unless its `esm_class` or its state says otherwise, and only `ENROUTE` and
`SCHEDULED` say otherwise.** SMPP 3.4 Appendix B lists every other receipt state as final, `SCHEDULED` say otherwise.** SMPP 3.4 Appendix B lists every other receipt state as final,
@@ -296,8 +296,7 @@ Grouped by what each one constrains.
library cannot read with no `messageDlr` at all — goal 2 wants that reported as undetermined, not library cannot read with no `messageDlr` at all — goal 2 wants that reported as undetermined, not
withheld. Both spellings resolve into `Dlr.intermediate` at the boundary rather than being read a withheld. Both spellings resolve into `Dlr.intermediate` at the boundary rather than being read a
second time in `DlrMerger`, so the library cannot answer the application one way and conclude the second time in `DlrMerger`, so the library cannot answer the application one way and conclude the
other; this library's own `sendDlr('ENROUTE')` goes out as an ordinary receipt, which is where the other. `sendDlr('ENROUTE')` writes 0x04, so the state test is what the marker test cannot replace.
two would first disagree.
- **`smsIdFormat` names a notation per place, and normalisation never reaches inside a `<base>-<n>` - **`smsIdFormat` names a notation per place, and normalisation never reaches inside a `<base>-<n>`
id.** An SMSC may answer `submit_sm_resp` in hex and write the receipt's `id:` in decimal, so one id.** An SMSC may answer `submit_sm_resp` in hex and write the receipt's `id:` in decimal, so one