3
0
mirror of https://github.com/larvit/adf-codec.git synced 2026-11-12 11:48:29 +01:00

Answer prose round 2: 1 🔴, 3 🟡; state the global loop's weights, code health's fourfold weight under 7.0, and goal 10's overlap

This commit is contained in:
2026-10-20 12:03:03 +02:00
committed by Lillem4n
parent 781d2c8e14
commit 9ff63ba3f4
2 changed files with 9 additions and 7 deletions
+1 -1
View File
@@ -53,7 +53,7 @@ In `docs/decisions.md`:
- `message` and `path`
- Publish on a version bump
- Docs describe the release being built
- Plan items rank by rank_todo.py's weights, code health first, then each achieve goal at 0.97 times the one before
- Plan items rank by the global loop's goal weights, code health first
- No schema validation
- The gate runs on Deno and Bun
- The gate installs the tarball
+8 -6
View File
@@ -585,13 +585,15 @@ depend on a store that the gate would then have to keep.
Docs on `main` describe the release being built rather than the version npm holds, so they match it
the moment the bump publishes; add no interim note marking the gap.
## Plan items rank by rank_todo.py's weights, code health first, then each achieve goal at 0.97 times the one before
## Plan items rank by the global loop's goal weights, code health first
2026-10-20, the maintainer, after the global ranking changed: this repo follows it and keeps no weights
of its own. Serves the order the README gives its Achieve goals (`## Goals`), and code health, which
every project pursues above its README goals. `rank_todo.py` sets the weights; `todo.md`'s `## Scoring`
keeps the formula and the bar, which are the project's to tune. Valid while `rank_todo.py` sets the
weights.
2026-10-20, the maintainer, asking that this repo follow the global loop's rankings after they changed.
The repo keeps no weights of its own: the global loop's `rank_todo.py` sets them. Serves code health,
which every project pursues above each achieve goal its README states, and the order the README gives
its Achieve goals (`## Goals`). By position, each achieve goal weighs 0.97 times the one before, code
health first. While the comprehension overall is under 7.0, code health weighs 4 times its position
weight. README goal 10 restates code health until item 124 drops it. `todo.md`'s `## Scoring` keeps
the formula and the bar, which are the project's to tune. Valid while `rank_todo.py` sets the weights.
## No schema validation