3
0
mirror of https://github.com/larvit/adf-codec.git synced 2026-11-13 04:08:29 +01:00
Commit Graph

745 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
lilleman 3ad1bd504e Record the paired ruling: same 2026-10-09 14:37:06 +02:00
lilleman 335c3fbc70 Answer stability round 3: the portable writer merges adjacent nested task lists after the split, so it never writes !adf:listBreak 2026-10-09 14:37:06 +02:00
lilleman cd6cb8bece Answer prose round 1: a task item keeps the task lists right after its paragraphs nested, and the README, changelog, decision, comment, item 49 and a test title say it plainly 2026-10-09 14:37:06 +02:00
lilleman 0c56a479bb Answer product-owner round 3: the changelog keeps nested only a task list before the block that splits the item 2026-10-09 14:37:06 +02:00
lilleman 217ab190f3 Answer product-owner round 2: the README's read-back cell and the changelog keep a nested task list nested, and item 93 ships in 0.2.0, where the portable reader first ships 2026-10-09 14:37:06 +02:00
lilleman 5b9fd4127d Answer product-owner round 1: the README's read-back cell states the split, and the changelog and decision word it exactly 2026-10-09 14:37:06 +02:00
lilleman 67bdc3ca44 Answer stability round 1: a task list nested beside a task item of paragraphs stays nested when written, the property checks every block task item holds paragraphs alone, item 49 names the checkbox loss it closes, and item 93 files the stale refusal path 2026-10-09 14:37:06 +02:00
lilleman 1ece265ea4 Record the reading cost 2026-10-09 14:37:06 +02:00
lilleman 654a960888 Stand a block a task item cannot hold after its task list, in portableMarkdownToAdf and adfToPortableMarkdown 2026-10-09 14:37:06 +02:00
lilleman 1870111427 Answer product-owner round 1: the changelog adds no gap note, item 7 names HTML in the tagline and keywords again, and the keywords name gfm 2026-10-09 13:07:56 +02:00
lilleman 3f7cc81e80 Record the reading cost 2026-10-09 13:07:56 +02:00
lilleman c66cbc288b Describe only markdown in the package description and the README's tagline 2026-10-09 13:07:56 +02:00
lilleman 310207fab5 Rescore: the paired ruling at 239218f reads the same 2026-10-09 12:21:18 +02:00
lilleman a616f798af Answer auto-reviewer round 1: the migration recipe keeps the marks of a hard break no text beside it holds, so a link of a hard break alone keeps its target 2026-10-09 12:21:18 +02:00
lilleman 7be5f70851 Rescore: the paired ruling at 37629e4 reads the same 2026-10-09 12:21:18 +02:00
lilleman 6b09275387 Answer stability round 5: item 89 replaces takesMarks, and the decision's date line wraps 2026-10-09 12:21:18 +02:00
lilleman 8beefe8833 Answer product-owner round 3: the spec says a directive mark's content holds something besides hard breaks 2026-10-09 12:21:18 +02:00
lilleman 4c9b46f57e Keep a directive mark's content on one line where it is emitted, as main does 2026-10-09 12:21:18 +02:00
lilleman 90de9ba7be Rescore: the paired ruling at f195ebd reads the same 2026-10-09 12:21:18 +02:00
lilleman ba21c7a462 Answer architecture round 4: the writers close a mark run at a hard break again, and item 91 plans the joined spelling 2026-10-09 12:21:18 +02:00
lilleman b3f4d0f5c1 Rescore: the paired ruling at 45b5446 reads worse 2026-10-09 12:21:18 +02:00
lilleman 77a6806160 Answer architecture round 3: one joinsBreaks flag in place of the parted set and its retry loops, a directive link spells its break, and takesMarks names the table's field 2026-10-09 12:21:18 +02:00
lilleman e04f026676 Rescore: the paired ruling at 6f1a16b reads worse 2026-10-09 12:21:18 +02:00
lilleman e4364b19d0 Answer prose round 1: plainer decision title and spec, the refusal the spec owes, and comments that say why 2026-10-09 12:21:18 +02:00
lilleman d1a47e861c Answer stability round 4: the empty-link decision's title names the hard breaks kept 2026-10-09 12:21:18 +02:00
lilleman c9aa49d99d Move item 33 to 0.2.1 2026-10-09 12:21:18 +02:00
lilleman 06c225f8f4 Keep the hard breaks a link text holds alone, after its destination, and move item 89 to 0.2.1 2026-10-09 12:21:18 +02:00
lilleman 486661311f Answer stability round 3: a link directive holding a joined hard break falls back to parting it 2026-10-09 12:21:18 +02:00
lilleman 1d05ee3df3 Answer stability round 2: a run that cannot be spelled parts at its hard breaks before the carry takes it, and the recipe bullet names the content it passes 2026-10-09 12:21:18 +02:00
lilleman 852d010ff7 Answer product-owner round 1: an emphasis or link run spans an unmarked hard break, the recipe drops a hard break's marks, and the refusal names hard breaks 2026-10-09 12:21:18 +02:00
lilleman 2340937fb2 Answer architecture round 2: the refusal row says a carried node escapes it, and the empty-link decision's title names the hard-break case 2026-10-09 12:21:18 +02:00
lilleman 2ca5ac41e6 Answer architecture round 1: the node table says a hard break takes no marks, and a link text of hard breaks alone reads as its destination 2026-10-09 12:21:18 +02:00
lilleman 32bee5ab91 Record the reading cost 2026-10-09 12:21:18 +02:00
lilleman 3ff5c95f4c Build a hardBreak carrying no marks where a mark spelling spans a line break, in every reader 2026-10-09 12:21:18 +02:00
lilleman 78655bcdc0 Rescore: the paired ruling at e7029c1 reads better 2026-10-09 10:49:08 +02:00
lilleman f7eb88ec1b Answer architecture round 5: name the alert and callout markers by their spelling, and item 56 its functions 2026-10-09 10:49:08 +02:00
lilleman c7dcf67f70 Reflow the image changelog entry 2026-10-09 10:49:08 +02:00
lilleman b868ba9ce2 Answer product-owner round 3: the changelog names the task marker 2026-10-09 10:49:08 +02:00
lilleman 38d2fa94e1 Rescore: the paired ruling at 1098b5e reads better 2026-10-09 10:49:08 +02:00
lilleman 8a28df1026 Reflow the marker-line paragraph 2026-10-09 10:49:08 +02:00
lilleman 7da47d7aab Answer architecture round 4: a folded callout's title line is no paragraph, and item 56 names the bracket resolution's range 2026-10-09 10:49:08 +02:00
lilleman 0c6379a541 File the em 1/3 exceptions for examples 638 and 639 as pending under item 87 2026-10-09 10:49:08 +02:00
lilleman 255a1fced7 Record the maintainer's approval of the node-model exceptions and the reader panel's verdicts 2026-10-09 10:49:08 +02:00
lilleman d677222050 Read an image alone on an alert's marker line or the lines after it as the image, as a reader panel expected; item 88 filed 2026-10-09 10:49:08 +02:00
lilleman ee3086ad1e Answer prose round 1: one sentence per idea for the image readings, a decision title that states the rule, item 86 names its shapes 2026-10-09 10:49:08 +02:00
lilleman 446efded6c Answer product-owner round 2: keeping an image an image needs nothing else on its line, and a quoted image is pinned 2026-10-09 10:49:08 +02:00
lilleman 050364dbdc Answer stability round 2: a link slot keeps a linked image linked, so the link-in-link refusal holds 2026-10-09 10:49:08 +02:00
lilleman c3c624f66e Answer product-owner round 1: the docs say how to keep an image an image, and the empty link takes its own changelog entry 2026-10-09 10:49:08 +02:00
lilleman d97c5c2935 Answer stability round 1: an !adf:link slot reads an image as plain alt text 2026-10-09 10:49:08 +02:00
lilleman 029b835e22 Rescore: the paired ruling at c45320b reads better 2026-10-09 10:49:08 +02:00